There comes a moment in every genuine spiritual search when you realise you are not uncovering a secret about the universe; you are uncovering a secret about your own brain and mind. The entire arc of spirituality, from the oldest Upanishads to the insights of the Buddha, from the GGS to the reflections of modern mystics, ultimately turns on a single discovery: that time is psychological. And when psychological time ends, the whole movement of becoming collapses back into silence. The Truth is simply this ending.

Most people search as if Truth were somewhere else — hidden, distant, waiting to be reached. But the final step reveals the opposite. Time is created inside the brain-mind through the continuous activation of memory, interpretation, and projection. The machinery of the Default Mode Network holds this entire structure together, giving rise to the sense of a self moving through time, narrating itself, protecting itself, predicting, worrying, hoping, imagining. This is the world of becoming. It is also the root of suffering, because it binds the mind to a movement away from the now.

When the mind becomes deeply silent — truly silent, not controlled, not forced, not trying to silence itself — the DMN dissolves. Neuroscience sees this in the brain; mystical traditions saw it in direct perception. The narration loses energy. The psychological centre loses its continuity. The internal clock of becoming stops. What remains is awareness without movement. This is the ending of time. The mystics called it Sunyata, the Gurus called it A-Kal, Krishnamurti called it the ending of the self, neuroscientists see it as the collapse of default-mode processing, and physics describes this same state at the boundary where spacetime itself thins. All of these languages are pointing to the same experiential event.

In this silence the brain stops comparing the present to the past. It stops projecting futures. It stops trying to become anything. And because there is no movement in the mind, there is no psychological distance. Distance and time collapse together, leaving only the immediacy of what is. This is not a trance. It is a hyper-clear perception, where awareness is free from the distortions of memory and emotion. What the mystics perceived as the “eternal” was not an endless duration; it was the absence of duration. A timeless field in which perception stands naked, without the self.

The DMN dissolves because it has nothing to hold onto. Its function is narrative maintenance, and narrative cannot exist without time. When the mind is in deep silence, the past loses its grip, and the future loses its pull. The DMN has no computational reason to stay active. What remains is a different mode of consciousness altogether — an awareness that is not owned by the personality. In this, there is no self to defend, no observer separate from the observed, no fragmented centre. There is only seeing.

The mystics intuited this thousands of years ago, often describing it as entering the hidden rooms of the mind. These rooms were never mystical in the sense of supernatural; they were simply layers of processing normally clouded by noise. Tukdam states in Tibetan traditions hint at what the mind becomes when the DMN remains dissolved even after the body has stopped functioning. It shows that consciousness has depths the ordinary mind never reaches because it is too busy maintaining its own story.

We are now able to understand the same insight with clarity. Spirituality began as a human attempt to understand why suffering continues. The answer was never in rituals or beliefs; it was always in the structure of the mind itself. The ending of time in the brain-mind is the ending of psychological suffering. When time ends, becoming ends. When becoming ends, the self ends. When the self ends, reality is seen directly.

This is why the search stops here. The Truth is not another layer to discover. It is the dissolution of the movement that was doing the searching. The end of becoming is the beginning of being. The ending of psychological time is the beginning of the timeless. The mind rests in the quiet clarity that has always been underneath.

There may be nuances left to explore — subtleties in mind spaces, glimpses of Tukdam-like transitions, the behaviour of awareness when the DMN dissolves for longer periods — but the core has been reached. This is the centre. Everything else is only refinement.

This is the last step of the spiritual search, and it was always waiting inside your own brain and mind. When time ends, Truth begins.

Most people know “Sat Sri Akal” as a Sikh greeting, but few realise that its meaning opens into one of the purest spiritual insights ever articulated. Sikhism was never meant to be a belief system. It was built on direct perception — seeing reality as it is, without the interference of the self. At the centre of this vision stands a single word: A-Kal. It does not mean eternal in the sense of living forever. It means beyond time altogether, the silent field that exists before birth, before identity, before thought. When Guru Nanak returned from his three days in the river, he did not return with a doctrine; he returned with a perception. And through that perception he pointed to what the mind becomes when the self dissolves and the timeless reveals itself. This article enters that space, not through belief, but through the doorway of direct seeing.

Sikhism begins where belief ends. It does not ask you to imagine a God, accept a doctrine, or inherit a tradition. It asks only one thing: to perceive the truth directly. This direct perception — this raw encounter with reality before thought, time, and identity intervene — is the living heart of Sikh philosophy. And the clearest name it gives to that truth is A-Kal: the One beyond time.

A-Kal is not eternity stretched out forever. It is not immortality and it is not the survival of the soul. A-Kal is something far more radical: the disappearance of time itself, the vanishing of the mental structure that creates birth, becoming, decay, and death. A-Kal is the centre before the projected self arises, the silent field from which all forms emerge, and the place to which all forms return.

Guru Nanak’s awakening in the river Bein was not a moment of belief. It was a rupture of perception. For three days he disappeared into the waters, and what returned was not the man he had been but one who had seen — seen directly that the divisions of Hindu and Muslim were creations of the mind, not of reality. This was not a theological insight. It was a moment when the projected self dissolved and the timeless field revealed itself.

This is why the Mul Mantar opens not with a story but with an ontological statement: Ik Onkar. Satnam. Karta Purakh. Nirbhau. Nirvair. A-Kal Murat. These are not descriptions of a distant deity. They are the qualities that appear in direct perception when the mind becomes silent and the self falls away. The Gurus were mapping the structure of reality as it is seen when the observer disappears.

Sikhism rejects all indirect routes — rituals, intermediaries, superstitions — because indirect perception always strengthens the projected self. A person who performs rituals is not seeing truth. A person who repeats beliefs is not seeing truth. For Sikhism, truth is neither inherited nor imagined. It is encountered directly when the mind stops projecting its own illusions.

This is why Naam Simran is often misunderstood. It is not repetition of a name; it is the quieting of the mind until the deeper field reveals itself. When memory and anticipation fade, when the machinery of the self no longer binds the mind to time, the presence of A-Kal appears — not as a belief but as a fact of perception. The Gurus used the word Anubhav, meaning direct experiential knowing. Without this direct perception, the scriptures say, nothing is truly known.

The entire Guru Granth Sahib is a map of this transition — from the projected self trapped in Kal (time, causation, decay) to the recognition of the centre that is A-Kal (timeless, unborn, uncreated). Every metaphor and every line points back to the same realisation: truth is not found by extending the self, purifying the self, or perfecting the self, but by dissolving the self. What remains when thought falls silent is the Timeless One, the field without beginning or end.

This is why the Sikh greeting, Sat Sri Akal, is not a casual hello. It is a reminder spoken to another being: the truth in you is not time-bound. The truth in you is A-Kal. Beneath identity, beneath the personality, beneath the story of life and death, one’s nature can be the same timeless presence the Gurus touched in their awakening. The greeting itself is an instruction — return to the centre, where you see through the illusion of the projected self.

In this sense, Sikhism is not a religion in the traditional sense. It is a practice of direct perception. It is a path that takes you from mental projection to unmediated seeing, from time to timelessness, from thought to silence, from the self to the One. When the projected self dissolves, what appears is not a new identity but the truth that was always there: A-Kal, the timeless reality that contains all things and yet is untouched by time.

The Gurus did not ask us to believe in A-Kal. They asked us to become silent enough to perceive it. Sikhism leads the mind out of time and into A-Kal, the silent field that appears when the self disappears.

Most people sense that there are two ways to live, but they never quite find the language for it. One feels familiar, driven by memory, personality, habit and the constant pushing and pulling of the mind. The other feels deeper, almost as if life begins to move through you rather than from you. This article enters that space through a single, simple insight: that human beings live in two modes of unfolding, and that the Guru Granth Sahib, perhaps more clearly than any other scripture, was intentionally designed to show the movement from one to the other. When you see this distinction, the architecture of spiritual life becomes clear, and the wisdom of the GGS, the Bible, the Gita and Buddhist teachings suddenly align into one pattern. What follows is an exploration of this pattern, using the image of the projected self and the centre-source as the visual key.

Every human being stands between two movements. The projected self is the first. It is built out of memory, reactions, conditioning, comparison, desire and fear. It projects outward into the world, shaping itself through the past and pushing itself into the future. It lives on the surface of life. It creates conflict not because it is evil, but because it is always in motion, always becoming, always moving away from the centre. This is the personality we recognise as “me.” It has stories, preferences, wounds, pride, anxieties, ambitions and roles. It lives through thought, and thought lives through time.

The second movement is the unfolding centre. It is not a belief or an emotion. It is the silent source within, the place where awareness rests without effort. When the projected self is quiet, the centre begins to unfold into life. It does not project; it reveals. It does not seek; it sees. It does not push; it responds. The image is the luminous form whose centre glows like a quiet sun, connecting downward into the ground of perception and upward into the subtle field often called the intelligence of the universe. It is here that life feels coherent, aligned and unbroken. This is not spirituality as practice; it is perception without distortion.

The Guru Granth Sahib is built around this shift. It begins with Ik Onkaar, not as a doctrine but as a description of what becomes visible when the mind aligns with the centre. Karta Purkh does not mean a distant creator. It means the One Doer, the presence that acts through us when the projected self ceases to interfere. The opening line is a blueprint for the entire human transformation. The rest of the Granth unfolds this opening through the human condition, showing how the mind moves away from its centre, becomes trapped in its projections, suffers through its own momentum, and finally returns to the source-field within. This is why the GGS feels alive when read from silence; it is built to speak to the centre, not to the personality.

The Bible contains the same distinction, though described differently. Jesus speaks of two births — one of flesh and one of Spirit. The first is the projected self, born of habit, identity and memory. The second is the centre-source, awakened through direct encountering of the silent field that lies behind perception. When Jesus says “The Father and I are one,” he is not speaking of metaphysics but of alignment — personality surrendered, centre opened, action flowing from a deeper source. In the Gita, Krishna instructs Arjuna to act without the claim of being the doer, shifting him away from the ego-self into centre-driven action. And in Buddhism, the movement from self to emptiness is the movement from projection to origin, where the mind no longer stands separate from the field it emerges from.

The projected self on one side, unfolding centre on the other — is the diagram that all these teachings imply but never draw. The projected self lives through psychological time, fragmentation and reactive becoming. The unfolding centre lives through direct perception, insight and the intelligence that arises when the mind is silent. One creates karma; the other dissolves it. One tightens the world around the self; the other opens the world into clarity. One is mechanical; the other is alive.

This is why the distinction matters. Most people live entirely in the projected self, and so life feels heavy, repetitive and turbulent. A few live from the centre-source, and for them life moves differently. They do not escape life; they move within it without resistance. Their perception is clear because it is not filtered. Their actions seem effortless because they do not originate from personal will. Their relationships are natural because there is no struggle to maintain an image. The GGS calls such a person gurmukh — centre-facing. The manmukh, by contrast, is self-facing, always turned outward, away from the source.

Daily life reveals the difference. When the projected self acts, even kindness is burdened by expectation. When the centre acts, even small gestures carry the weight of truth. When the projected self thinks, it generates conflict. When the centre sees, it resolves conflict before it arises. When the projected self tries to meditate, it wrestles with itself. When the centre awakens, meditation is simply the natural state of perception. The difference is not in behaviour but in the place from which behaviour unfolds.

This brings us back to the image. The two figures are not two people; they are two modes of being in one person. The dim figure is the personality, always projecting, always reaching outwards. The luminous figure is the centre, unfolding quietly. The light at the heart is Karta Purkh perceived within. The upward spread suggests intelligence flowing in both directions — into the world through action, and into the mind through insight. The ground beneath indicates the seamless continuity between inner silence and outer life. Seen this way, the image is not just symbolic. It is architectural. It is a diagram of human consciousness as understood through the GGS.

This architecture reveals why scriptures from different traditions ultimately converge. They are not pointing to different gods, different heavens or different doctrines. They are mapping the same shift within the same human structure. The projected self must be understood, but not obeyed. The centre-source must be uncovered, but not imagined. The movement from one to the other is the story of spiritual life, psychological transformation and human awakening. And when you see it, the GGS, the Bible, the Gita and Buddhist texts no longer appear separate. They become different languages describing the same event.

In the end, the question is simple: from which place do we live? If we live from the projected self, life is a continuation of our past. If we live from the unfolding centre, life becomes the direct expression of the One Doer. The shift is not a belief. It is perception. It is the mind seeing its own movement, recognising its limits, and falling back into the source from which it came. And when that happens, the meaning of Ik Onkaar becomes clear. It is not a statement about the universe. It is a statement about the human being when the projected self dissolves and the centre-source stands revealed.

Every origin story begins with a density so deep it seems impossible. Modern cosmology calls it the Big Bang: a hot, expanding plasma that cooled, condensed, and eventually formed stars and galaxies. In this picture, protons emerge after the first moments of the universe, about a millionth of a second after expansion begins. They are products of the early universe.

But there is something weird in how the universe is structured. We need to look at how the universe was created, in how it is explained by Nassim Haramein. Years in development via time and insights in the mind. Haramein showed some relationships in the Universe that suggest how the universe might have scaled up from a single point.

Nassim Haramein approaches the same question of the Big Bang from the opposite direction. Instead of viewing the proton as a late arrival, he asks whether its internal structure might already contain something of the universe itself. Not as a mystical metaphor but as a geometric possibility. His work begins by examining the proton not as an isolated particle, but as a tiny region of curved spacetime filled with an enormous number of Planck-scale oscillations — the smallest meaningful units of the vacuum.

What he calculates is simple in its design and startling in its result. He estimates the vacuum energy density inside a single proton by counting how many Planck Spherical Units would fit within its volume. Then he takes the total number of protons in the observable universe and applies a holographic scaling: a way of comparing the information or curvature inside one system to that of another, larger system using surface-to-volume ratios. When this scaling is applied, the energy associated with all the protons in the universe produces a value close to the measured energy of all visible matter — the 5 percent of the universe made of ordinary atoms. This means the energy inside a single proton after scaling is equal to the energy of all visible matter.

A curious detail sits beside this. Years before the “proton radius puzzle” unsettled mainstream physics, Haramein’s holographic calculation produced a proton radius close to the smaller value later measured using muonic hydrogen. Haramein’s holographic calculation landed close to the smaller proton radius first measured in 2010 and confirmed again in 2013 using muonic hydrogen. The numerical closeness added another layer to the sense of symmetry in his work — the feeling that the geometry inside the proton may be whispering something about the larger order of the universe.

Before turning to the standard cosmological view, it is worth noting the scale involved. Cosmologists estimate that the observable universe contains on the order of 10⁷⁹ protons, with a realistic variation of a factor of a few depending on density, composition, and the size of the observable region. It is not a fixed number, only an estimate tied to what we can currently see. The universe beyond our horizon may contain far more.

In the conventional model, the early universe expanded from a small, dense state governed by general relativity and quantum field theory. Energy cooled into particles; quarks condensed into protons. The mass of visible matter is explained through particle interactions, nuclear synthesis, and the energy–mass balance of the early universe. Nothing in the mainstream view suggests that the structure of a proton determines the mass of the cosmos. The holographic principle exists as an abstract boundary-information concept, not as a direct link between a proton’s interior and the universe itself. It suggests that the universe may express a holographic structure, where the same informational pattern appears repeatedly across different scales — from the very small to the very large. The pattern scales up and down the structure of the universe.

Haramein’s result touches something intuitive — the idea that nature may repeat the same pattern across scales. His scaling law does not replace the Big Bang or alter the chronology of the early universe. But it raises a quiet question: why does the vacuum inside a proton, when examined through holographic ratios, resemble the energy content of everything we see?

The symmetry remains unexplained in standard physics, but it is not meaningless. It points to a deeper coherence in how spacetime distributes curvature and energy, whether in a subatomic particle or a spiral galaxy. The universe may not have been born from a proton, but the proton may still carry a geometry that reflects the universe it inhabits.

Haramein’s contribution sits here: he showed that the vacuum energy density inside a single proton, when scaled holographically across the total number of protons in the observable universe, produces a value close to the total energy of all visible matter — the 5 percent we can observe. The geometry of the small seems to echo the geometry of the whole — not as proof, but as possibility.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

In our daily lives, we move between mind spaces without even noticing. The difference between a restless, fragmented mind and a silent, coherent one is not only psychological — it is vibrational.

When you scroll through TikTok or lose yourself in a rhythm, your brain often operates around eight hertz. This is the alpha range, a frequency of quiet engagement. It is not yet meditation, but it is the prelude to it — a baseline of presence. At this point, the sense of “now” begins to stabilise. The world seems immediate, light, and somewhat effortless.

Go deeper, and the frequency slows to around four hertz. Thought no longer moves as it did before. The self begins to lose its edges. In Buddhist terms, this is the cusp of Śūnyatā — emptiness, where perception remains but identity begins to dissolve.

Below four hertz, the mind disappears altogether. This is the threshold where you fall into sleep or deep unconsciousness. Dreams arise here not from clarity but from the nervous system trying to maintain coherence — bursts of sleep spindles and replays that mirror life but without awareness.

Yet if you remain awake while moving through this threshold, something remarkable happens. Awareness begins to perceive itself. Time loosens. The boundary between observer and observed fades, and what is left is a silent witnessing — a pure, open field.

Between eight and four hertz lies a narrow bridge. It is here that the ordinary mind yields to the deeper field. The surface of thought ripples, then stills, and the faint vibration of the universe begins to echo through awareness. Every insight, every moment of realisation, is born here — in this subtle transition between movement and stillness. The ancients called it the door of knowing.

Stay here long enough, and perception changes texture. The world no longer appears as a collection of separate things. Instead, it unfolds as one living pattern — self-organising, breathing, aware. You begin to see that reality is not composed of matter alone but of rhythm, density, and relationship.

When you return upward through the frequencies, you bring something back. Not a memory but a re-ordering. The field of silence has touched the mind, and thought now carries a different quality. It becomes lighter, more transparent, closer to the truth of things. Creation flows easily. Words and actions begin to mirror the stillness they emerged from.

This is how deep meditation changes life without effort. The deeper spaces reorganise the surface. The tangible reshapes itself around the intangible, as if the universe responds to coherence with coherence.

Most modern commentaries on attention and consciousness overlook these mind spaces. They describe the measurable — behaviour, dopamine, productivity — but miss the geometry of awareness itself. To speak only of tangibles is to describe the waves while ignoring the sea.

The mind is not a fixed organ but a living field that spans frequencies. The eight-hertz state is where you live; the four-hertz cusp is where you transform; below that lies the invisible source of all mind. When all three are sensed at once, you begin to experience wholeness — the synchronisation of all frequencies into a single hum of being.

And when the hum becomes silence, there is nothing more to add.

Postscript — The Cleansing of the Higher Frequencies

What happens when the mind rises back from silence is more than relaxation; it is re-ordering. This observation arises from both neuroscience and contemplative phenomenology — two lenses that are finally beginning to meet. When the mind descends into slower frequencies, from beta down to alpha, theta, and sometimes delta, the networks that sustain thought, identity, and sensory processing begin to quieten. The familiar hum of self fades, and what remains is a broad synchrony of awareness.

In this descent, the default mode network and the salience network — those responsible for self-referential thought and emotional relevance — drop away. Meanwhile, the thalamus and cortical midline structures begin to synchronise at lower frequencies, re-tuning the entire field.

When awareness rises back from these depths, the “frontline” systems — the cognitive and sensory networks operating at higher frequencies — do not resume in the same scattered pattern. They come back coherently phased with the slower oscillations. What returns is not the same mind that went down, but one cleansed by alignment.

In spiritual terms, this has always been called purification. In physiological terms, it is the re-synchronisation of fast cortical oscillations with the slow, global ones. The deeper field acts like a tuning fork, resonating through the layers of mind. Each descent into stillness resets the system, and each return carries the signature of coherence.

This is the true meaning of cleansing — not a moral act, but a natural recalibration of consciousness itself.

Comments:

It seems that when one realises that there is this tangible side to us and an intangible, abstract side to us — you will find a lot of what you read just explains itself of what you know about the brain and mind and thinking and awareness. Our thinking is from reality to abstraction. Wake and sleep. They all have this pattern. The holographic principle will show you how everything within us and without and into the universe, is scaled up scaled down this way. So when the organised brain gets scrambled in any way, you can see how it scales up into the abstract. I sense that spirituality, as explained by the mystics, is really played out in how the brain and mind is organised and affected by the externals. So then you might enquire when does enquiry end — I think when you live the process of having the full potential of yourself in the brain and mind. After that it is just being. Anything you read and study and education works best when it fits well into the full potential in you.

You can test this — when silent, see if you can predict the future — a month ahead, or even a year ahead — perception via a sense of knowing. See if they come true. Then how can you use this: retrocausality — “about using foresight as guidance and then adjusting your present intentions and actions so that the future unfolds differently.” If you stay silent in your centre (this is not the self hoping) and then visualise how you want the future to unfold for you — only now the universe knows what you want for the future. Only now it can hear you. If you think you have it — the nuances of the final process are very delicate and one needs to keep going until one experience/perceive it all.

There is a way of seeing the future that does not come from thinking. When the mind is completely silent, perception extends beyond the present and touches what is waiting to unfold. It is not imagination or prophecy; it is the quiet recognition of what already exists in potential form. The future is not somewhere else — it is here, folded within the same stillness that holds the present in you.

When awareness is centred, time loosens its grip. You can project gently forward without leaving the now. The field that you touch is fluid; every possibility moves like ripples in light. In that meeting, a sense of knowing arises — a soft clarity of what may come. It does not announce itself in words. It simply feels true. This knowing is the bridge between the silent now and the active one.

Retrocausality begins here. The moment you sense what lies ahead, you do not have to bring it back. Within that same silence, you can shift its tone. The field responds to awareness immediately; the probabilities rearrange themselves when your state changes. You alter the direction of unfolding simply by being aligned differently. Nothing travels through time — it all happens in the same still centre.

Yet there is also the “now” of action. When silence deepens into daily life, the inner shift begins to shape outer form. You make small changes — how you speak, what you prioritise, how you care for the body or treat another. These are not efforts to control the future but the physical translation of the inner realignment. The wave becomes a particle; the field becomes experience.

Both “nows”, of the silent mind and the “now” of action belong to one continuum. The silent “now” reshapes the pattern in the invisible; the active now allows it to appear in the visible. Together they form the living process of retrocausality — awareness sensing the future, shifting within silence, then expressing that shift through conscious living.

To live this way is to turn time into dialogue. The future no longer arrives as fate; it participates in your awareness. The more you dwell in silence, the more clearly you feel its feedback — a fine adjustment in mood, an intuition to act or to wait, the quiet assurance that a path has already opened.

This is not mystical power but the natural symmetry of consciousness. When the mind no longer divides time, cause and effect meet. The centre becomes the bridge through which the universe listens and responds.

Stay silent until knowing arises. Let the field adjust itself through your stillness. Then act in harmony with what you have seen. The two nows complete each other — the unspoken shift within, and the gentle correction in life. The universe hears both, because they are the same voice.

Most people spend their lives inside the visible world, surrounded by forms that seem solid and separate. Yet beneath this apparent solidity lies a deeper fabric — a field of coherence that holds everything together. From time to time, certain individuals cross the threshold into this abstract domain. It happens in deep meditation, during near-death experiences, or, as in the recent case of biohacker Bryan Johnson, through a high-dose psilocybin journey.

What draws us to explore such realms is not curiosity alone but an ancient longing — to experience the truth behind appearances. To see not merely what reality shows, but what it is. In this pursuit, perception itself becomes the portal. When the mechanisms that define oneself loosen, the mind begins to perceive without boundaries. The everyday self, which usually filters the world into names and objects, momentarily dissolves, revealing an unbroken continuum.

What Johnson experienced was not chaos or delusion but entry into the abstraction zone — the space where reality and consciousness overlap. The Default Mode Network, the brain’s organiser of identity and time, relaxed. The field behind perception began to shine through. Time lost its linear flow; trees seemed to breathe; faces appeared alive with the pulse of energy that underlies all matter. The world he saw was still the same, yet its foundation had shifted from form to frequency.

In that expanded perception, the universe no longer appeared as something out there. The observer and the observed were the same vibration folded back on itself. He felt this as oneness — the disappearance of the dividing line that thought normally enforces. The happiness he described was not the excitement of sensation but the pure resonance that arises when consciousness meets its own source.

To glimpse this field is to realise that the world we inhabit is a projection, a holographic condensation of something infinitely subtler. The brain usually acts as the collapse mechanism that translates that boundless field into a localised story of “this body” and “that tree.” But when the collapsing relaxes, awareness enters the space before form takes shape — the wave reality that all things emerge from.

This is not a hallucination. It is a rare reversal of perspective, where one perceives the background instead of the picture. The patterns of energy that give rise to matter become visible, and with them comes the sense that everything is alive, everything connected, everything arising from one field of intelligence.

To experience this directly is to know, not as belief but as being, that existence is whole. The abstraction zone is not somewhere else. It is here, just beneath the frequency of thought, waiting to be seen when the mind grows still enough to perceive its own foundation.

Reference:

Biohacker took ‘magic mushroom test’ and is now ‘happy to be alive’ after trip changed him

When we ask for something from life, most of us don’t realise we are asking from outside the centre — from the self that feels separate, lacking, and incomplete. In that moment of asking, we have already told the universe: I do not have. And the intelligence at the centre does not respond to absence, because absence is not part of its language. What the centre understands is alignment, not request. It does not need words. It understands only the quiet power of feeling — the inner state of it is already so.

This is why the elders, like the man in Gregg Braden’s story, did not pray for rain. He did not stand in the circle and ask. He closed his eyes, stood barefoot on the earth, and felt the rain as though it was already falling. He felt the mud between his toes, smelt the wet stone walls, heard the soft patter on the ground, felt the corn heavy with water brushing against his skin. And then he gave thanks — not for rain that might come, but for the rain that had already come. He did not step out of the centre to search, to ask, to plead. He remained in it and let the feeling of completion rise within.

This is the power of the centre. You do not project your desire outward and hope something out there answers. You return inward to the place where separation dissolves. In that stillness, you sense — not as imagination, but as reality — the outcome already formed. And you stay there. The body, the senses, the heart are aligned with what already exists in the field of possibility. The centre does not create through wanting. It creates through becoming.

When you ask from the self, you are sending a message from outside the centre: I am missing, I am lacking, please give me. The intelligence at the centre cannot process this because it has no reference for separation. But when you stay at the centre and feel life as though it has already moved, you are no longer asking — you are participating. You are not demanding a future; you are standing in it. You are surrounded by the answer, as the ancient texts said. You are enveloped by what you desire. You are aligning with the possibility that exists in the Quantum field and experiencing it.

This is not wishful thinking. It is a different way of being. You do not force outcomes. You do not chase. You stand in the centre, and you feel the world already shaped around your deepest truth. Then you give thanks — not as hope, but as recognition. And life begins to move. People call it a coincidence, a miracle, manifestation. But it is simply the centre doing what it always does — translating inner coherence into outer unfolding.

So the real prayer is not “please make it happen”. The real prayer is being with it as though it already has. When you do this, you are not asking life to bend to you. You are dissolving into the intelligence that is already shaping life. And from there, what is needed will come — not because you pushed, but because you remained.