Perception, 2nd November 2011
Perception
The information on perception is subjective. Hence the subject is as free and confusing as Art itself. So though we can look at this from different angles, I want to look at it with a new purpose of how the 2 century’s technological influences can affect an artist until one can almost say that he is no more responsible for the work he produces. Can I start with the entry points to the self: old natural sensors of sight, smell, touch, sound. Then there are the invisible sensors that create the extrasensory perceptions: the body as an atomic sieve that receive electromagnetic energy all the time passing through this sieve and creating data and images that the body creates in the mind: so you ‘see’ in your mind, something that is normally invisible. These are the natural possibilities. What if on top of this sits the last 20 hundred years of invented technologies? How does this add to the interpretation and perception of the individual? Is it possible that it becomes altered so much by this incursion that it is no longer the product of the particular mind. How does this affect the artist?.
The 2nd century has bought on some new technological inventions that have piggy backed on the old sensors. Technology today is able to change the perception of an individual sometimes so subtle that one does not ‘recognise’ the tools being used. Wireless technology can get close enough to your skull and into it to alter the way you think. But the fascinating aspect of all this is that wireless technology does get close enough into the skull to perceptively alter your reasons for doing things and that is already doing a lot. I am also interested here to see how this influences the artists so he makes work that is not of his or her interest but rather that of those of the perpetrators of the technologies (to be discussed further along). And one can go about doing work, creating works of art, thinking that it is of one’s own, but rather perceptively altered and influenced (initially without one knowing) by ‘voice to skull’ technologies, seeing through walls, synthetic voice playback or speech synthesis: synthetic voice play back with voice recognition probably through a keyboard. When used in conjunction with ‘voice to skull’ inventions perpetrators’ can playback the voice of a person who you know is saying things you don’t want to hear or would not be normally said by the friend. So today there are sufficient tools about and in their different combinations can alter the perception of a person: an artist to make work that is controlled by an external force. The mind, for some reason, with these new toys seem to find the worse it can do and does it: like tagging an individual and following him, invasion of privacy, blackmail and when seeing through walls, as you might have in some airports these days: an individual can find no place to hide. Working tagging units can set themselves up in different countries where the individual is tagged from country to country, where groups operate through a central master mind. These groups might not know each other, but pass on jobs from country to country. They operate like some other units do in the world today, only that here the work is done silently and the perpetrators’ are ‘invisible’. In operating in this way, the net that is cast can be widening every day in the world.
Though I am discussing this in a general way, trying to organise the big picture first, I would like to go into some detail as to how the invisible technology operates. Lot of it is driven by universities that are doing some ground breaking research on ‘perception’ (like Reading university say and will come to it later) but are picked up by individuals, groups etc and modified and used for shenanigans, spying, tagging etc. I don’t have to remind you of the smart phone spy software that is discussed openly in the news and how ones every movement can be followed. Like from this link:
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/spy-smartphone-software-tracks-every-move-050242556.htm
‘Software designed to completely mine every secret on a smartphone can track its users, record their calls, copy their emails, read their text messages and bug the rooms the phones are sitting in.’ and how do they do it:
It starts with a little ‘social engineering’.
‘By hacking the phone of someone the victim might trust, and learning something about them from reading their Tweets and Facebook page, the attacker will send a personalised email from a known account.
The user opens an email and a document, a picture, letter or pdf file.
A programme can be embedded in the attached document which takes the hacked user’s phone off to a secret website site which covertly downloads spying software onto the smartphone.’
AND
‘"There is no way that a victim would know his phone had been comprehensively hacked.”
Attacks on smartphones shot up by 46% last year, and this year the percentage is likely to be in the thousands.’
But don’t bother dumping your smartphone as you look really cool with it, while you follow the tag.
The smart phone adds a very powerful tool to the perpetrators’ as a whole. The smart phone is useful when the tagged individual is on the move, eaves dropping, listening to conversations, spyware software switching phones on when the owner thinks that the phone is off and listening in to conversation, GPS, that is on-the-move-matters of spying etc. But voice-to-skull perpetrators are more invasive. They do get into your skull and this new aspect of tagging is to GET closer to you. They are not just satisfied in following you with your mobile phone: they have to cover that space between you and your mobile phone and get INTO you. The reason they do that is so they can now hear you THINK. And they can. And I think here my information can start becoming a bit fuzzy BUT they CAN hear you think. Because they can hear you think there is no place for you to hide. And if they can control an individual this way, then they can control a small group of people and which then becomes a bigger group of people and bigger ……with aims of changing the world or bringing down a government. But remember with me I am only interested in the individual and the artistic process. How is an artist affected or influenced by all this so that his work is not made by him anymore. You understand I am not interested in how in using such a technology an individual can be investigated through his mobile, spy ware in his computer, spyware to read his computer screens so his banking data is known and then blackmail. I am not interested in any of that understand. Or how such technology can be used to organise groups to protest and bring down governments, kill undesirable leaders. All this of course is bringing on a new world. Desperate governments might use the technology to keep an eye on its people, or different groups of people vying to protect their own interests. These are just suggestions: the artist mind following the stream of thoughts: getting connected to the Rupert Sheldrake’s morphogenetic field and thinking at a certain frequency, watching how your tongue speaks when all you are doing is just thinking. The implications of this is that when you are at an ATM trying to remember your PIN number and think as you type (your mouth closed and not a word said) in your PIN number: voice-to-skull perpetrators can know your pin. They don’t need any technology close to you: they only need to ‘read’ your mind and I think they are doing this indirectly by this thing of ours or ‘talking’ when we think. Try it: pretend that you are in front of an ATM machine and think that you are typing 1,2,3 and 4 and watch your tongue move as you do this. Yes Human thing we all do it. They either monitor the pressure alterations in your mouth or the movement of the tongue muscles – like how the keyboard logger virus works, that transmits everything that you have typed to the perpetrators’ when the virus is in your hard disk having got there through an innocent e-mail of a friend say – not through Spam e-mail anymore. The keyboard logger software recognisers the characteristics of all the keys on the keyboard and they know what you type – e-mails read and search engine research: that is anything you type is read etc. So from the computer hardisk to your mind. Research has already been done on how a magnetic sensor placed under your tongue can read what you think. It sure ain’t Bingo this thing, but the perpetrators’ don’t need a magnetic sensor under your tongue but they can read your mind and possibly indirectly through your tongue. UNLESS the target is transmitting through a frequency that can be picked up which I think is unlikely. The ‘center’ of the mind is the processing unit: it gets all its information from the external sensors, including your invisible sensors. It then transmits after processing during the thinking process. If you understood how data is transmitted from this center during thinking then you can acquire data from that process. If Professor Kevin Warwick can implant a chip in his arm and that of his wife’s and sense a kind of ESP experience, then you can read thinking. All you need is that chap walking past you to have a chip in his arm and he picks up the information that comes out of your thinking mind. Not impossible this thing of reading off your mind. Try it as an experiment, nothing to lose: Next time you are out and about just repeat a phrase in your mind, just keep repeating it, with no other kind of thinking, and see if somebody will tell you what you are repeating. Just an experiment. Then you might find out, as an experiment you understand, just how many of Professor’s Kevin Warwick’s chips are up and about and modified to smartphone status, quickly quickly fast and modified to be even more precise: that is now possibly the future of the mind: new technologies on top of the old natural sensors. Why wait for evolutionary development of the mind and ESP to catch up, when you can get it right now with new technologies.
http://www.kevinwarwick.com/
(Kevin Warwick is Professor of Cybernetics at the University of Reading, England, where he carries out research in artificial intelligence, control, robotics and biomedical engineering.)
OK some info on reading your tongue.
Patent application title: TONGUE OPERATED MAGNETIC SENSOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090309747
‘A method of tracking movement, position, or both of a tongue of a subject. The method includes positioning a tracer unit on the tongue of the subject in a non-obstructively manner; positioning a sensor system in proximity to the tongue carrying the tracer unit; calibrating the sensor system relative to the tracer unit; and detecting the position of the tracer unit. An assistive system/apparatus can track movement, position, or both of the tongue. The system/apparatus includes the tracer unit; the sensor system for detecting position of the tracer unit and adapted for non-obstructive placement proximal the sensor system; and a control system for transmitting to a processing system.’
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090309747#ixzz1cQTiKoNX
‘In an alternative approach, i.e., the wireless approach, the USB wireless receiver on laptop side can be split into at least two parts, one of which is a dedicated wireless transceiver with USB interface to communicate with laptop and the other of which is a wireless receiver without USB connection combined with the interface circuitry and sitting at PWC side, as illustrated in FIG. 20B. The wireless transceiver 2065 can be connected to the laptop 2015 and thus firstly configured as a receiver. The wireless transceiver 2065 can receive the sensor outputs from the system 2005 and forward them to laptop 2015 for processing. After the laptop 2015 extracts the command(s) from this data, the same transceiver 2065 can be configured as a transmitter and wirelessly send out the control command at a different frequency to the PWC 2075 side receiver. On the PWC 2075 side, if a valid control command is received, the local MCU 2025 can start the same process as explained in previous approach to convert the command to a set of square waveform to control the PWC.’
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090309747#ixzz1cQRE9qKu
One thing is for sure: it is not the story of Pocahontas, right. But coming soon to a cinema screen near you if you also consider that any speech form might generate a pressure speech wave but perhaps having a shape different to the spectrogram seen below of the words, ‘I owe you’:
Spectrogram of the words: ‘I owe you’
Just to quickly summarise again: in any closed unit, like if you had a plane load of perpetrators, one is easily targeted. Voice to skull synthetic speech can be very precise that only you hear and not others. It has a synthetic element to it, played back from perhaps a keyboard speech; maybe even in the voice of someone you know, speaking in a detrimental manner which can confuse you: put neighbour against neighbour in conflict, friend against friend. I need to summarise the structure of the operation before I proceed: so you see how it works clearly. Remember I am only interested here in how it affects the artist and his work, his form in composition that he peddles as his own. Also remember voice to skull can be as subtle as it wants to be or as loud as it wants to be. If it remains in subtle mode it can go on for years and you would not know. When they are loud and if they want your money, blackmail you, drive you out of your homes so your property could then be bought cheap. They could clear out large areas as branded voice-to-skull affected areas so property prices would fall as people would not buy them in those areas, and then the perpetrators’ would come in and buy them cheap in areas that they blighted themselves. I am not sure (I know I have to do the summary drawing first but just a minute…) if the authorities’ are involved or not. I think information that is collected through these means by the perpetrators’ are passed on to the authorities (that is their fun if the blackmail does not work or a target refuses to accept the position he is in……) and the establishment does look at them and use them. That is the real scandal: the protectors have become the perpetrators’. Sad state of affairs but I think this is true. All this is lower middle management levels. Depending on the countries you go to. I think if the upper level management knew that this was happening: it would all end very quickly. But really it is the PEOPLE who can STOP it now: who are the uses of the technology. If you put your foot on your smartphones and then in your bin, you can stop half the problem right now and maybe even all of it. If they don’t have anybody to share their info with, then it all ends. Talking of sharing all your info by the perpetrators’ with the public: I must add here that not all the information is streamed out to the public. Remember they are having some fun with you, while at the same time blackmailing you: they make sure they make you look really detre-mental before they collect the money. Making you look really detre-mental is their job and then when you had enough, after they investigated all your worldly matters, then hands out: Bojangles, money please, is the name of the game. But I am not interested in all this and I am serious about this. I just want to know how much of the work of an artist is really his own. Knowing that such technology exists today. And also I am interested in what the 2 century new world in the Horizon is going to look like. If you don’t stop it now while the technology is just beginning what happens when the day comes when the structure widens and they don’t need to be sitting in your neighbours’ homes to do this: that is when they don’t need to be close to you anymore to spy on you. If you don’t stop it now then you will never stop it when it gets out of control. Below is the structure of close up tagging of an individual, an artist, a politician, a banker, a teacher etc. This structure is perhaps how they do it:
Remember outside your home they will follow you with your smartphone, ‘siri’ iphone application or Google’s ‘latitude’. But when you are at home it is a little more difficult for them to tag the artist. First they have to get into your home, then they have to get into your mind. Of course this is all also possible in your office, in an aeroplane etc. the set up can take some time to be in functional mode, but I am beginning to think it does not have to be very elaborate as it can happen in an aeroplane – not many places in there you can hide very sophisticated large surveillance equipment. The process involves acquiring of thinking data and then transmitting.
Can we look at the home set up. Remember that is the only place you cannot run away from very quickly, especially if you own the place. You have to go back there every day.
Outside of your front windows there is the possibility of planting wireless bug cameras, some very small to be seen easily and solar powered. Other possibilities are: they can be developed to be as light as dust, hence you carry it in your eyes, your mouth, ears?. The smaller bugs can be hidden in the bark of trees. This practice is already rife in the city. In large shopping malls in London and elsewhere it can be used to spy on shoplifters etc. They watch you from a central surveillance point. And even voice-to-skull technology can be used in this way by subtle messages to ‘tell’ you to enter a particular shop. All this to stay on top of the competition. I was surprised to see this used in big shopping malls around the world. BUT partly it is this technology that has been hijacked by the perpetrators’ and used to intimidate and blackmail etc. if I am allowed to go through the setup in the diagram then I can show you on the net how all this is starting to be discussed. Somewhat difficult for the perpetrators’ when they have to be so close to the target at the present moment. But I don’t doubt that if allowed to progress the situation can be more difficult to control in the future. One other thing I like to point out here is that this technology first used perhaps for good reasons have now been discovered by the chap next door and probably the process has become user friendly. Sometimes it is difficult for the perpetrators’ to control their excitement. They have new powers at their disposal. Their work can stay in memory after it is experienced, and can be quickly ‘spotted’, especially when you have been in the space before. Synthetic speech can be easily recognised. For targets this is a very good tool to remember, sentences are short and curt, not a natural spoken form but coming out of a keyboard. I also like to point out before the point is lost in the ether that you will find these problems in big cities, big city shopping malls, more developed countries, their advances in technology coming back to haunt their citizens.
Ok going back to the diagram: the neighbours who are employed are usually recruited as a result of need rather than permanent employment. They don’t belong to the main set-up of CEO’s of the high office spying Ltd. Neighbour recruits are usually threatened by the same people who they worked for to get some of their money back. They could offer large amounts to start with to new recruits but then turn on them later for ‘some money back’ like they do at the supermarkets in the UK: “do you want some money back”. These neighbourly recruits are not wanted as permanent perpetrators’, big money to recruit them then intimidation. The spying network is wide and from country to country where ‘jobs’ are passed on. The higher more established perpetrators’ who owns the spying companies are sophisticated clean shaven with beautiful women by their sides – happy to take your money and your homes when it is offered to them. In a closed system like an aeroplane on flights between countries it can be difficult to get away from them. I suspect that if you ever come across them they don’t give up easily because they feel being invisible makes them invincible and this is why when they act they think nobody is watching.
.jpg)
(The installation and photographic study was preparation for the painting, ‘Transformation’.
The object is life size and purchased from an antique shop in Portobello Market in London).
Mandala, 2010, 150cm x 180cm, oil on linen
Back to the diagram: neighbours spying on you can video you through their walls when you are in your shower room, toilet, what else do you do that you don’t want people to see or know at home. They capture all this or at least they make sure you know that they are doing all these things. Also you do not know how much of what they capture is streamed. But as an example: small camera’s capturing images by your neighbour above you (possible recruits are neighbours on either side and above you too) can be seen in the latest movie, ‘it is not about the money’: ‘Killer Elite’. And also the bingo bottle. You can find camera detectors from ‘Maplin’ in London, a major chain of electronic shops selling electronic gadgets. They sell camera detectors, both the cheaper ‘pro hunter’ and the more sophisticated ones that can pin point the position of a bug camera: cameras so small that they are difficult to locate with the naked eye. So, it is not as if they don’t know that the problem is around. It is just that YOU don’t know. The thinking data, the intimate data, from the neighbourly recruits, are then passed on to the controlling unit who then sifts through the data and chose what they want to stream. The controllers behave like ‘kids’ who find it hard to hide their excitement, but well versed in matters of data acquisition and streaming of data. A ‘mile away’ sit the more sophisticated, steam pressed uniforms of the CEO’s….. I doubt if each group knows who their bosses are and they operate like some independent groups around today: yet together they can be a big force for intimidation and badness and also goodness if they are so inclined at times. They chose what they want to do, sometimes giving away classified information to be more friendly hoping to recruit.
‘London has begun a two-day international conference focused on the threat from cyber-security attacks.’
1st and 2nd of November. please see link below.
Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales had said that ‘hackers are running Hub nets of computers they have hacked into.’
It was suggested that a break in into personal details should warrant the same punishment as a physical break-in into a home - the cime should be of equal stature.
Also in the link below:“Ross Anderson, professor of security engineering at Cambridge University, said there had been a “great growth” in cybercrime over the past six years.
As many as 5% of PCs are infected with malware - short for malicious software - Prof Anderson said, and there was a one in 20 risk that any given computer was sending spam without the owner’s knowledge.
“If you want to defend against this kind of threat it’s not enough to just shoot a few crocodiles, you have to drain the swamp,” Prof Anderson told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“We need action against the whole ecology of cybercrime, not purely defensive measures to protect, for example, the Foreign Office."”
So it is not like it is tea time in London. But cyber burglars are now starting to come out of their screens with their keyboards and physically going after individuals for the purpose of blakmail and murder. i did not hear any of this mentioned. The world really has become 1 with its new technologies and network of mobiles.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15533786
Like i said earlier that the technology has been around for a while, used in shopping malls: voice-to-skull, synthetic voice playback, to keep an eye on shoplifters and for some fun at the mall. Bug cameras are a little more serious, and video capture through walls, they are starting to play ‘dirty’. The perpetrators are dangerous people involved in blackmail and murder. Some of their scams, just to repeat, is to drive people out of their homes by blackmail, home after home in an area, and then to buy out properties in the area blighted by them cheap while their targets are still on the run. I suspect that the perpetrators of the property scams are probably people who would move into the areas where they target for a scam. They would then study their neighbours, collecting information: facebook, this book and that book. Then twitter to see what he say. Observation. They would start to recruit similar minded householders who have lived in the area for a long time. Big money to be made from driving away householders by tagging and then buying properties cheap in blighted areas. After they have watched you they now need some information about you that they can throw back at you before you start running: blackmail then murder. They need to read some of your e-mails to get closer to you. The keyboard logger virus comes in NOT through spam e-mails anymore. They know you know that you have to stay away from spam e-mails. So they will send you the virus through a friend of yours. The virus comes in unknowingly when you open the e-mail of your friend. The virus is not detected by any of the major virus softwares. Now anything you type on your keyboard is transferred wirelessly. All your new e-mails are easily read. Your old e-mails will be soon read as from the keyboard logger, they will know all your passwords. Even if you are hardwired directly to your ISP for broadband, they can soon read your e-mails again with a little bit of jingle jangle. You have a solution for your passwords if you use a ‘virtual keyboard’: the software keyboard on your screen if you have it. Remember the keyboard logger recognises the way your different keys on your keyboard sound when you tap on them: each of them sound different when pressure is applied to them. You can say that they each have a personality of their own. They keyboard logger virus is programmed to recognise these ‘different personalities’ on your keyboard. You open up your bank account and they probably can screen print that page so they can see the details. They start to look out for your weak points. They will first rattle you by showing you what they know about you. They might ‘voice to skull’ you a password of yours to start the final stage of execution. Then your friendly neighbours start to begin work. Monitoring sound across the walls, video surveillance and passing the information to the nerd controllers who is driving the mission and taking advice from the CEO’s. Information captured and information discovered about you is then streamed along to mobile smartphones as it cascades thorough the city, with cool people and their smartphones switching them on and wondering whats happening. ‘somebody is following him/her’. If that is not enough to stop the target and collect the money, then some serious investigation is required to stop the individual. Local controllers will take advice from CEO’s to end projects or to continue. There can be pauses in surveillance when they are deciding. But perpetrators don’t like losing. So they keep going taking the risk of exposing their methods further from a target that has been in the space for too long. The longer a target is in the space the better he understands and recognises the process. It is virtually entering a new space to live in and you get used to its ‘flavour’. And you know there is a new world out there. The mind expands to start seeing differently.
In the London cyberspace security conference (1st Nov. 2011) they describe the perpetrators’:
“We’re seeing a migration of traditional organised crime groups over into cyber, exploiting a new type of person engaged in crime who tends to be young, technically sufficient, very good at maths and physics, but perhaps not your traditional criminal figure in the outside world.” So that is the reason why cyber burglars are now starting to come out of their screens with their keyboards and physically going after individuals for the purpose of blackmail and murder. The crime groups enticing the NERDS to come out and do some crime: blackmail and murder for the sake of monetary gain. Cyber Killer Elite’s: not with the gun, boom boom bang bang, but with a bagfull of software, smartphones, and some gadgets. They are a creative expanding group, like the artist they invent new form or new patterns to exploit.
i just need now to add links for this article to add weight to what has been said here. i did think of adding them as i went along but i though the streaming summary was probably easier reading. but lots of what was said can be backed up with today’s research. This has to be experienced to be enlightened by it. It is a different normal space when the technology is taken away. When you have lived in both spaces you realise what a fantastic artistic idea this can be: to walk into a gallery room and to be inflicted by all the technologies that is used by the perpetrators’ and to have the individual live in that space for a moment and to see what it is like to switch spaces by stepping into and out off a room. Perhaps feel what ‘becoming’ and ‘silence’ can feel like. But todays Cyber Nerds are starting to become criminals by being enticed by criminal gangs to get out of their computer screens and onto the street (yes from london cyber security conference 1st nov 2011 - not me).
some links:
http://targetedindividualscanada.wordpress.com/2011/11/14/voice-to-skull/ -subliminal voice-to-skull - already being used in London(must see)
http://targetedindividualscanada.wordpress.com/2011/11/12/electronic-harassment-devices/ - electronic harresment devices
http://targetedindividualscanada.wordpress.com/2011/11/16/implants/ - nano technology implants
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/02/us-britain-brown-hacking-idUSTRE80109N20120102 - Gordon Brown’s e-mails hacked while finance minister
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/grant-evidence-privacy-041807918.html - Hugh Grant to give evidence on phone hacking. But it is not only the phone.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/paul-mccartney-shown-phone-hacking-evidence-133922814.html - paul-mccartney-shown-phone-hacking-evidence
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/reasons-to-wear-tinfoil-hats/ - Warrantless Wiretapping, Warrantless GPS Tracking etc.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15867858 - Leveson Inquiry: Actress Sienna Miller gives evidence - tagging and hacking evidence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCJjcS-WcOo - annoying people with sound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N87kNv50W_Q&NR=1 - voice to skull are now in millions of people
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obLsJEK9mi0&feature=related - Countermeasures for Gang Stalking
http://voicetoskull.com/ - voice to skull quick read
http://ezinearticles.com/?GPS-Bug-Detectors---Todays-Surveillance-Bugs-and-How-You-Can-Detect-Them!&id=2359343 - GPS Bug Detectors.Surveillance Bugs and How You Can Detect Them!
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/spy-smartphone-software-tracks-every-move-050242556.htm - “Track every text, every call and every move your spouse makes...”
http://en.wiki.org/wiki/The_Killer_Elite_(2011_film) - Movie (its not about the money).
http://www.amurgsval.org/shadowrun/espionage.htm - Mission Impossible espionage
http://technofriends.in/2008/04/30/email-spoofing-and-how-to-protect-your-online-identity/ - Email Spoofing and How to protect your online identity
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/category/voice-to-skull/ - High Tech Harassment
http://www.eyespymag.com/prohunter.htm - Lipstick Size Wireless Camera And RF Detector
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2007/0706-seeing_through_walls.htm - Computer scientists and engineers have developed a new technology for the purpose of seeing through walls.
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090309747 - A method of tracking movement, position, or both of a tongue of a subject
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090309747#ixzz1cY0dT4rC
http://www.voicetoskull.com/Per.htm - “We will not stop. Till PERPETRATORS are brought to Justice”
http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/09/27/you-got-a-license-for-that-keyboard/ - you got a licence for that keyboard
http://edge.org/ - Harvard and Princton professors not afraid to discuss edgy stuff.
http://www.sherlockinvestigations.com/index.php?page=tscm-order - diy bug finder
http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/siri.html - ‘Siri’ on iPhone 4S
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/smartphone-security-risks-and-how-to-beat-them.html - Smartphone security risks and how to beat them
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/stalking-victims-let-down-system-045931223.html - Stalking Victims ‘Let Down By The System’
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_sensing - Remote sensing is the acquisition of information about an object or phenomenon, without making physical contact with the object (wiki)
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/P/passive_satellite.html - passive monitoring (and if technology is modified and advanced it could be used for distant monitoring and distant ‘voice to skull’ matters).
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/facebook-users-hit-porn-attack-133455867.html - facebook users hit by false malicious images. (17 Nov 2011)
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/212574 - Your modem used against you - hacking probe by the USA against China.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15786743 - Hacking through your modem: “The fact that our critical infrastructure could be used against us is of serious concern”. (18th November 2011).
http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/42559/find-my-friends-wife-cheating - questions over privacy with ‘find my friends’ application or,”....maybe Siri will be able to offer some marriage guidance advice.” (17/Oct/2011)
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rowling-miller-media-inquiry-025749262.html - Actress Sienna Miller told the Leveson Inquiry:"I felt like I was living in some sort of video game and people pre-empting every move I made, obviously as a result of accessing my private information.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15881297 - Cybersecurity: Ministers seek help from business
http://au.news.yahoo.com/technology/mobile-technology/article/-/12213799/android-app-that-spies-on-your-phone/ - Android-app-that-spies-on-your-phone
http://news.yahoo.com/smartphone-spying-204933867.html - smartphone spying
http://www.abuse.ch/?p=3130 -Rogue ISP’s - make sure yours is not letting you down
http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/hiddencameradetector-spycamerafinder.htm? -Pocket Sized Wireless Camera Hunter Finds All Wireless Cameras No Matter How Hidden…
CMPID=PD_Google_%5bpro+hunter+camera+detector%5d&utm Watch the cameras watching you! Scan the airwaves from 900MHZ - 2.7 GHzfor
_source=Bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=%5bpro+hunter+camera+detector%5d wireless video cameras and view the footage directly on the Camera Hunter’s 2.5” LCD Screen.
Perfect pocket device for covert counter surveillance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMxX-QOV9tI&ob=av3e END. youtube song ‘Price Tag’.
ps
http://www.kevinwarwick.com/ and
http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2007/11/28/kevin_warwick_interview_feature.shtml
“Kevin Warwick is Professor of Cybernetics at the University of Reading, England, where he carries out research in artificial intelligence, control, robotics and biomedical engineering.”
If you need clarification on voice to skull matters and need to see how in the future it can develop (and become more dangerous) by some of the work that is now done in Universities. Like the university of Reading. You want to look into the work of professor Kevin Warwick. Just to summarise he has implanted a chip in his hand connected to his nerves and he then uses this to control the hands of a robot - wirelessly. The robot was not given precise commands but rather ‘learned’ to move its fingers from the Professors by studying the wireless signals going from the professor to the robot. Wicked or what. and he did not stop there: i gather he connected a similar device to his wife’s hands and, ‘experienced a kind of ESP experience’. And i think the world is coming to an END!
pps:
I would not have been this precise with a diagram if i had not come across Professor Kevin Warwick’s research. Here you have physical reality of a chip implanted into the nerves of your hands which can send signals out wirelessly to a robot that learns to imitate the living person in the experiment. Professor Kevin was recently featured in BBC’s ‘Horizon’, featuring cutting edge ideas on science etc. They ran this programe close to the Cyber security meeting of world leaders in London on the 1st and 2nd of November. Also BBC World Wide news channel on satellite TV featured short clips of Professor Warwick explaining how adaptive the mind is with his mind working the fingers on his Robot arm: he explains that the mind adapts to the signal that is returning from the robot arm and through the chip in his arm and into his mind and back again to the robot arm. The mind senses the signals coming back from the robot arm and when it sees what the fingers on the arm does and it remembers this and then sends that particular signal back to the fingers to mimic the same action. Its on the spot programming by the mind that is done wirelessly. No programmer or program in between i assume. The mind is such a magic organ that it senses what is needed and sends out the signals that is required for the action to be repeated in the fingers of the robot. Then it was also said he had ESP like experiences with his wife after both were fitted with chip implants, data transfered wirelessly between husband and wife. I think wireless monitoring of a person’s thoughts is already here and working quiet efficiently. I suspect that it also does not need a closed controlled environment for it to work well. It monitors thinking, not necessarily directly from the thinking brain, but possibly through speech. I said earlier: a persons talks (silently) when he thinks. That is why thinking out pin numbers is not secure. We can’t help it, we silently talk when we think. Tongue muscle movements or pressure pulses in the mouth can be monitored to translate thinking. This new world 21 century living ain’t Bingo anymore. We have already created the big clever toys which can pat us on our backs and start playing with us. You want to also consider Rupert Sheldrake’s Mophogenetic Field as a very strong possibility where data stored digitally in the ether by individuals can now be retrieved and used. Digital data in a hard disk with a storage structure and digital data in the ether also with a natural organised storage structure - both same thing, functional. What’s that? not possible for nature to have an organised digital data base: the universe is not naturally organised enough for you?. So that person walking past you down a busy shopping mall wants to know what you are thinking and he has this chip like Professore Kevin Warwick has implanted in his hand and into his nerve cells, then the perpetrator knows where you are going right. He knows which ATM you are going to use and what is your pin number. Then you thinking i want to go home after this, catch the tube from the Victoria line in London and go north as far as i can and he already know how far you going. You go home and you think you safe but your neighbour now has to start work. What a great way to earn some work at home cash. Your neighbour click click on his toys and you are ready to have your shower and you neighbour is ready: all awake to start work. Then maybe he like to share what he got with his friends, over the fence, behind your garden. They all buddies since they young and they like some jolly time watching. Your equipment so easy to use now that you have no trouble operating them. Your neighbour pass data over to his friend at the back over the garden and you think they such angels and clever with what they can do and you probably right. The nerd who came out of his computer and join a criminal gang and now play playstation for real with real people. The criminal gang needs somebody who can ‘read’ the new inventions, so he looks to the nerd to help him. This is what the Cyber Security Conference in London said when all the countries met on the 1st and 2nd of November 2011.
See link below for big bells alarm ringing:
LONDON – A leading Internet security expert warned Tuesday that a cyber terrorist attack with “catastrophic consequences” looked increasingly likely in a world already in a state of near cyber war.
Speaking outside a global conference on Internet security in London, Eugene Kaspersky, a Russian math genius, told Sky News the threat was a real and present danger.
“I don’t want to speak about it. I don’t even want to think about it,” he said. “But we are close, very close, to cyber terrorism. Perhaps already the criminals have sold their skills to the terrorists—and then ... oh, God.”
Kaspersky, who founded an Internet security empire with a global reach, said he believed that cyber terrorism was the biggest immediate threat confronting nations as diverse as China and the U.S.
“There is already cyber espionage, cyber crime and hacktivisim [when activists attack networks for political ends]—soon we will be facing cyber terrorism,” he said.
THIS GUY kASPERSKY: I DON’T THINK HE CRAZY.?
150cm x 180cm ‘ending of time’ 2011
90cm x 122cm ‘easy peasy lemon squeezy’ 2011
by siri perera 5th November 2011.